20
Jan
Argentina in Falkland Island sailing permit move
Posted in Falkland Islands News by Discovery Falklands on January 20th, 2013
Argentina has said any boat sailing between it and the Falkland Islands will now need a government permit, increasing a row over oil exploration. The UK Foreign Office has rejected the move and said that the Falkland Islands’ waters were controlled by its authorities and would not be affected. Antony Weller reports.
Video Rating: 5 / 5
January 20th, 2013 at 11:16 pm
argie land thieves go back to Spain
January 20th, 2013 at 11:48 pm
GO HOME PIRATES!!!! THE MALVINAS ARE ARGENTINA!!!!!-
January 21st, 2013 at 12:10 am
and they would back you if you made child molesting a national pass time.If it wasn’t for you ignorant war warmongering fuckers and those others arseholes Iran there might be a modicum of a chance of peace there. Your own scripture tells you God took Isreal to punish you and it is not for man to return it to you. Your more orthodox and less fascist fellow Jews are disgusted by you and I feel sorry for them. Fucking hate nazis then behave exactly the same way with the Palestinians.
January 21st, 2013 at 12:21 am
Isrealis are fucking nazis’ (NOT THE JEWISH PEOPLE JUST THE ISREALI STATE) AND PONCE ALL OVER LAND THAT WAS BEEN OCCUPIED FOR OVER 2000 YEARS WHERE AS DESPITE BEING UNINTERESTED IN THE FALKLANDS for nearly 10,000 years until the uninhabited island was settled, the only people who have ever lived on the island wish to be British, unlike the Palastinians whose land you insist on fucking stealing even though EVERYBODY else in the world thinks your occupiers (except for the USA)
January 21st, 2013 at 12:29 am
That may be so ,but the worst of the worst ,like mengele ,and eichmann ,and the more serious culprits ,the main men ,went to south america , the ones more recently in america etc , were low ranked nomarks ,who may or maynot of committed offences
January 21st, 2013 at 12:43 am
@TheMightOfTheEnglisht the large majority of nazis went to the US; fact.
January 21st, 2013 at 12:44 am
Well, the Falklands/Malvinas are, indeed, surrounded by Argentina maritime space, so it makes totals sense to give notice of the presence of foreign ships in Argentine territory. What’s wrong with that?
January 21st, 2013 at 12:53 am
dont know what an isreali is sticking up for argentina for it was a haven for SS and nazis after ww2 ,and have had military juntas on and off ,who were dispicable,,britain took in many jews escaping from nazi germany ,while other countries were anti semetic in europe,half of you isrealiis are american/russian ,eastern european decent and you talk of israel as yours by historical right ,2000 years plus and 60 odd years ago you practically invaded palastine
January 21st, 2013 at 1:08 am
how can we claim the right ,well a british sailor discovered the falklands,we had a settlement on the islands before the spanish, who kicked us and the french out, what gives the right to argentians to claim argentina,most are european decent, the islands are in the atlantic as are south georgia,,what gives you the right to occupy the west bank,build settlements,and oust the native arabs, didnt see you jews complain when we liberated belsen,
January 21st, 2013 at 1:36 am
The people of africa had their lands but the british took them, the irish had their lands but the british said that belongs to the empire, the Indian had their land but the british kill 10thousend indian to take it, why the british deserve a cubic meter of land? if kelpers want the falkland they had to declare they self independent. And we dont bullyin the kelpers, cause we dont aim them with nuclear weapons, and we dont push them out in the 82
January 21st, 2013 at 2:09 am
Except cause argentina fought and get independent, the only kelpers death in falkland war were killed by british mortar fire, yes we can go back to europe but we would not declare this land property of spain or italy.
January 21st, 2013 at 2:45 am
Then they can go to their country Great Britain, in Europe, also do you think that puting persons that want to be british in anypart of the world and the land belongs to UK? If they want to be a new country and part of the commonwealth cool, but being a colony in America ?
January 21st, 2013 at 3:33 am
Bully the falklanders? we dont aim them with nuclear bombs, also the falklanders are not living there are working there, they dont fought in the war, didnt even care about the UK soldiers that die in there, so they arent people that wants to be british, they are british that wants to take a land that never belongs them, did the develoment of the falklanders depends on them or depends on the money of UK?
January 21st, 2013 at 4:20 am
in 1883 was argentine population, there was a constitution in there did the UK care? also the kelpers are not persons who decide to be british, are british in other territory, a colony, like those created in africa and asia to take the land of the habitants in there and steal their resources, same method same crime, how a genocide country that enslave people by the colour of their skin, should have right to take more lands?
January 21st, 2013 at 5:03 am
The right of livging there for 200 years. Do try and keep up.
January 21st, 2013 at 5:36 am
No they cant move, its their home. Try and force them out and you will be shot.
January 21st, 2013 at 6:31 am
Israelis stole their own land just like the Indians in the American reservations stole theirs so get your facts right. The point is you’re defending an occupation half way around the world feeling all smug but you’re not different from the Arabs occupying North Africa – still the same old imperialists using lies to defend yourselves while attacking the usual scapegoats. Just change your name to Britannistan and convert. You’re half way there already.
January 21st, 2013 at 6:36 am
4) the falkland islanders are NOT ruled by Britain,
5) NO ONE recognises (apart from a few south american countries) argentina claim,
and finally number 5) argentina claim to the island seem to hinge on 2 facts
1) the spanish forefathers of argentina, killed the ORIGINAL (british) settles. and took control of the islanders (but never occupied them)
2) they happen to be close to the coast of the land they settled.
January 21st, 2013 at 7:16 am
There is a huge amount of difference between the 2 situations
1) the british and french first settled the UNOCCUPIED islands before argentina even existed (french sold there settlement to the spanish, then the spanish kill the british settlers)
2) argentians are no more native to south american than the islanders are, they are descendants of european colonist as well.
3) argentina have NEVER owned the islanders, in the first place